![]() I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. "The stability is very good." "The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls." "Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture." "NGAV and EDR features are outstanding." "I like FortiClient EMS. Bitdefender's customer service is also regarded as more responsive and helpful compared to Microsoft's support. Some Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users say the solution is missing some features and needs improvements in central management. The solution earns high marks for stability, scalability, and reasonable pricing. Bitdefender offers a comprehensive set of features, including a built-in firewall and a slick management console. ROI: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers varied ROI based on different situations, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint delivers cost savings, enhanced efficiency, and heightened threat management.Ĭomparison Results: Our users prefer Bitdefender GravityZone EDR over Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. However, some users believe that Microsoft's pricing could be more affordable and mention complexities in their licensing models. There may be additional charges for extra features or services. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers fair pricing as it is included with Windows or Microsoft Office 365 subscriptions, without any additional licensing costs. ![]() Pricing: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR’s licensing is considered reasonable, and contract lengths are flexible. While it can be more complex for larger organizations, it is generally considered simple, particularly for smaller companies or those familiar with Microsoft environments. In contrast, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's setup is straightforward and not difficult, especially with preloaded installation on Windows 10. However, it may become more complex with new updates or older computers. Some customers commend the fast response time and expertise of the support engineers, while others express dissatisfaction with slow replies and a lack of coordination among the support teams.Įase of Deployment: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's initial setup is generally considered simple and easy, taking a maximum of 20 minutes. Microsoft customer service garnered mixed feedback. Service and Support: Opinions are divided about Bitdefender's customer service, with some users reporting prompt and helpful assistance and others experiencing responses and an overwhelming amount of emails. Users also requested better reporting capabilities and integration with third-party platforms. Users say Microsoft Defender for Endpoint should improve its central console and auto-recovery feature. The reviews suggest that Bitdefender GravityZone EDR can improve by adding a built-in firewall, optimizing deployment, and enhancing encryption. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and scalability. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security products. ![]() Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in file protection, encryption, and ransomware defense. It is known for its easy setup, scalability, and reasonable pricing. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.įeatures: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers comprehensive detection capabilities and an advanced management interface. We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our users’ reviews in five categories. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |